What's going on, and why we're not backing down
In March 2026, NIH filed a unit clarification petition arguing that Fellows are not employees, but trainees, and should be removed from the bargaining unit. If NIH prevails, UAW 2750's represented unit would effectively fall to zero. We've had our hearing, and the transcript is now public. Now we're waiting on a ruling. Here's the full picture: what NIH said, what came before it, and why this fight matters for the people and careers that make biomedical research possible.
How we got here
The dispute in front of the FLRA didn't appear out of nowhere. Fellows organized, won recognition, bargained a contract, and then NIH filed a unit clarification petition seeking to remove Fellows from the bargaining unit.
Fellows vote to form a union
NIH Fellows voted overwhelmingly for union representation. The Federal Labor Relations Authority certified the bargaining unit in December 2023, covering roughly 5,000 Fellows. 01
Fellows win a first contract
The agreement established enforceable gains on pay, benefits, leave, health and safety, harassment protections, workload, immigration-related protections, and a grievance process with neutral arbitration. 02 03
The broader research environment shifts
NIH attempted to sharply limit indirect-cost reimbursement that supports core university and research operations. A federal court later blocked the policy. 04
NIH files a unit clarification petition
In an email sent to UAW 2750's elected local president, NIH said the bargaining unit “should never have been certified” and filed a unit clarification petition arguing that Fellows are trainees rather than employees. If NIH prevails, all Fellows would be removed from the bargaining unit, effectively reducing UAW 2750's represented unit to zero, despite a collective bargaining agreement set to run through 2027. 05 06 12
“The NIH/UAW bargaining unit should never have been certified.”
Hearing held, decision pending
We've made our case. The regional FLRA decision is pending. In the meantime, Fellows are continuing to organize, enforce their rights, and act collectively around the conditions of their work.
What does the research show about unions?
The case at the FLRA is one fight. The larger question is why researchers across higher education and biomedical science have organized in the first place, and what collective bargaining can mean for the people trying to build sustainable careers in research.
Pay, benefits, mentoring, immigration status, workplace protections, and career stability shape who can remain in biomedical research and under what conditions. Unionization gives early-career researchers a collective way to bargain over some of those conditions rather than navigating them one by one.
Unionized graduate and academic workers have used collective bargaining to raise compensation and improve working conditions.
The biomedical research enterprise has long struggled with whether early-career research careers are financially sustainable, predictable, and accessible to people from different backgrounds.
Research on international postdocs documents gaps in pay, benefits, and mentoring, while immigration status can add another layer of dependence and uncertainty to an already contingent career stage.
Underrepresented researchers face unequal pathways through biomedical science, including differences in career intentions and persistence, making working and training conditions part of the question of who gets to build a research career.
What we've already won
This is not a hypothetical argument about what a union might do. These are provisions Fellows bargained for and ratified in the first contract.
Guaranteed annual pay increases and a commitment to standardize pay across NIH Institutes
Industry-leading protections against harassment, discrimination, and abusive conduct
Guaranteed paid parental leave and protected time off
Enforceable health and safety standards and workload protections
Expanded rights and immigration-related protections for Visiting Fellows
A fair grievance process with access to neutral arbitration
See the complete summary at uaw2750.org/what-we-won ↗ 02
What we can do when we act together
UAW 2750 is not a service we call when something goes wrong. It is us, NIH Fellows choosing to act together. And when we connect our local with tens of thousands of other UAW research and higher education workers, we can take on fights that no individual Fellow, lab, or workplace could carry alone. The shared resources matter because members built them, fund them, and use them together. 13
People made the fight for public research national
When research funding came under attack, workers did not wait for someone else to solve it. UAW members and allies organized rallies, phone banks, congressional visits, town halls, teach-ins, science events, and coordinated days of action. On April 8, 2025, tens of thousands of people took part in 37 Kill the Cuts actions across the country. Here at Local 2750, Fellows rallied outside HHS, spoke at Stand Up for Science, organized for Kill the Cuts, held science-funding town halls, and brought the case for NIH funding directly to lawmakers. Our local actions become harder to ignore when workers at universities and research institutions around the country are moving at the same time. 18
Legal action is one tool we can use together
Lawsuits are not where union power starts. They are one way organized workers can defend research, jobs, and rights when an institution or government agency breaks the law. Thousands of members pooling resources means workers can help sustain cases that would be impossible for one Fellow to take on alone, while members keep organizing publicly and politically outside the courtroom.
- Terminated NIH grants: UAW was a plaintiff in the federal challenge to NIH directives that canceled research based on disfavored topics. In June 2025, a federal judge ordered hundreds of terminated NIH grants restored. 14
- Thousands of stalled NIH applications: A later agreement covered roughly 5,400 NIH applications that had been frozen, denied, or withdrawn. By January 2026, NIH had issued decisions on about 700 of them and nearly 90% were approved. 15
- Harvard research funding: UAW and AAUP were plaintiffs in the first lawsuit challenging the administration's cancellation of billions in Harvard grants. A federal judge later ruled the $2.2 billion cancellation unconstitutional. 16
- NIH indirect costs: UAW backed the states' challenge to the proposed 15% indirect-cost cap and later filed an appellate brief describing the threat to research jobs, labs, clinical trials, and public health. The policy remains blocked. 04 17
We can make sure international workers do not face these fights alone
For researchers on visas, a workplace problem can quickly become an immigration problem too. Acting together lets members share the cost and risk of responding. We can maintain legal resources, spread reliable information quickly, organize coworkers around someone who is being targeted, challenge harmful policies, and bring public pressure when an individual worker would otherwise be isolated. 11
- Direct support: UAW maintains an immigration legal hotline, know-your-rights resources, attorney-led webinars, and referrals for members facing immigration emergencies.
- H-1B fee challenge: International UAW and UAW Local 4811 joined a federal lawsuit challenging the administration's $100,000 H-1B employer fee, a policy with direct consequences for postdocs, researchers, nurses, and other workers. 19
- The “Gold Card” program: UAW joined a federal lawsuit challenging the administration's $1 million Gold Card program. That case is ongoing. 11
- Visa status and protected speech: UAW members and allies have organized around SEVIS revocations and other immigration actions while legal challenges moved forward. UAW's Higher Education Department reports that the administration reversed SEVIS revocations after lawsuits and nationwide action by UAW members and others. 11
Sources
The point is not to ask readers to take our word for it. The reporting, agreement, research, and union materials are linked below.
Photo credits
Hero: Melissa Lyttle for Nature, from Max Kozlov, “Thousands of early-career NIH researchers forming union for first time,” 1 June 2023. View source ↗
A union with high membership is harder to ignore
Every Fellow in the bargaining unit is covered by the contract. Membership is how you get a vote, on leadership, on union decisions, and on what we fight for next.

